rechtspraakInstagram report
Last 50 posts
How this data was processed
Every post in this report, the 50 most recent from Feb 27 – Aug 6, was read the way the brain decides what to engage with: through a framework synthesising over 100 years of research in behavioural psychology, cognitive science and media theory. Each post is scored on the why rather than on vanity metrics: the cognitive hook that earns attention, and the reward that earns the reaction. Every score is measured against this account's own median, so each figure reflects how far a post beat or trailed its baseline rather than raw counts. What follows is the output of that analysis.
Every metric, in one table
Feb 27 – Aug 6 · 50 latest posts. Pick any metric to see how it moved over time.
Your account runs almost entirely on one reward
Every post earns a reaction through one of three psychological rewards. The arc shows the share of your content driving each one.
Practical, save-worthy posts. A dependable second lever.
Mirrors the viewer's own life — earns the like. Your single strongest lever.
Built to be shared or argued over. Barely present in your feed.
Your widest topics should be your tallest. They aren't.
Each block is a topic: taller = higher average performance, wider = more of your content. Blocks above the line beat your average. "Case Summaries" takes 46% of your feed but earns below your average — volume you're wasting.
Your top posts lead — but the middle holds its own
All 50 posts, ranked by performance. Tap or hover any bar to see the post. The top 5 take 31% of engagement, with a solid middle class behind them.
Every post, scored
Every post we analysed, scored on hook, body, reward and CTA. Flick through the shelf; tap any cover to open its full teardown.
What to post next
Each idea pairs a hook that already worked with a topic your audience already rewards — nothing invented, everything grounded in the analysis above.
“Heel veel plezier bij de Open Monumentendag in onze historische rechtbanken!”
Static image with overlaid text on a court open day scene
Replicates the community-celebration angle of the top-performing WorldPride post, which achieved the account's peak engagement of 314.0.
“Als je vertelt dat je rechter bent, dan verwachten mensen vaak een strenge, oudere man in een stoffige kamer die alleen maar in wetboeken leest.”
A video interview featuring two people in a seated conversation, alternating between close-ups and medium shots against plain backgrounds, ending with a branded graphic.
Uses the proven conversational video format addressing public misconceptions about judges, mirroring the second-highest performing post at 294.0 engagement.
“Vroeger dacht ik dat ik als rechter altijd direct objectief was, tot ik besefte dat onbewuste vooroordelen bij iedereen meespelen en je die actief moet tegenspreken.”
A studio-based interview video with alternating close-ups of two speakers against a purple accent wall, ending with a branded logo graphic.
Mirrors the successful self-reflective interview style on judicial biases that generated 258.0 engagement under the Judicial Integrity pillar.
“Wat doet de politierechter?”
A professional portrait of a judge in a courtroom setting with text overlay.
Directly replicates the high-performing educational portrait format explaining specific judicial roles, which previously earned 179.0 engagement.
“Hoeveel rechtszaken behandelt een rechter gemiddeld per jaar?”
Educational carousel with courtroom photography and solid color overlays
Emulates the structured, fact-based carousel format that successfully captured 162.0 engagement under the Judiciary Facts pillar.
Any questions?
Ask anything about this account — every answer is grounded in the post-by-post analysis you just scrolled through.
Try Trigger